April 6, 2011

New Hampshire Fee Schedule: Climbing a Mountain in the Fog?

Nearly a year ago we blogged the issue of a medical fee schedule in Maine. The legislature mandated the creation of a fee schedule way back in 1991. Twenty years later, there have been a few reports, a few changes in the membership of the committee trying to establish the fee schedule and, to date, no fee schedule. We now wonder whether neighboring New Hampshire will follow Maine's example, climbing a slippery mountain trail into a deep fog.

New Hampshire, like Maine, has a two tiered system: in the first tier are managed care networks, which negotiate fees with doctors and hospitals. Everyone in the second tier - those outside the networks, the self-insured, smaller carriers, etc. - are stuck with paying the "usual and customary fees." Medical costs account for 71% of total costs - a truly staggering number when compared to the national average of 58%.

Dr. Gary Woods, an orthopedic surgeon and chair of the NH Workers Comp Advisory Council, thinks that the high percentage of medicals is the result of good medical care, combined with a strong return-to-work focus: in other words, indemnity is relatively low because workers are not out of work very long. Well, doc, show me the numbers. I expect that New Hampshire - ranked 14th highest among states for comp costs - is spending too much on indemnity and way too much on medical services. It's no bargain for anyone.

The Fix is (Not Quite)) In
The New Hampshire legislature is contemplating SB 71, which would impose a fee schedule on medical services. The bill proposes that hospitals be reimbursed at a uniform conversion rate of up to 150% of Medicare rates. While somewhat on the high side for such linked payments, it would probably bring down the overall costs of medical services in the state.

SB 71 is going nowhere, at least for the moment. The bill will remain in committee while the lawmakers appoint a study group to review the proposal and make further recommendations.

Ultimately, the details of the fee schedule will be in the hands of the comp advisory council, of which Dr. Woods is the chair. Hmm. This brings to mind the stalemate in Maine, where Dr. Paul Dionne was for a long time chair of the committee responsible for implementing the fee schedule. The group just couldn't come up with a number that would satisfy the doctors. (How would a doctor define a fair fee schedule? "Usual and customary." ) Last June, facing allegations of a conflict of interest, Dr. Dionne finally stepped aside.

Perhaps the good folks in New Hampshire could speed up the fee schedule project by asking Dr. Woods to step aside. No doctor is going to embrace a cut in reimbursement rates. Dr. Woods would have a choice: he could sit on the sidelines and watch the committee hash out the details, or, with his health and well-being in mind, he could put on his hiking boots and climb one of the Presidentials. I recommend the latter, even if the peak is momentarily obscured by the fog.

Thanks to Work Comp Central for the heads up on this issue (subscription required).



While it's true that the Maine Workers' Compensation Board has not yet enacted an approved medical fee schedule, your memory fails you a bit regarding the former Executive Director Paul Dionne. Mr. Dionne is not a doctor, at least, not to my recollection, and I know him pretty well. He stepped out of the fee schedule debate last year because of a potential conflict of interest because he also serves on the Board of Directors of Central Maine Medical Center.

More recently, the new Executive Director, Paul Sighinolfi has indicated that arriving a approved fee schedule will be among his first orders of business for the Maine WCB.

One more thing, I believe your information about Dr. Woods as a member of the NH WCAC is out of date, as well.


Submit your email to be notified when this site is updated

Need help with your workers' comp program?

Monthly Archives

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Jon Coppelman published on April 6, 2011 12:21 PM.

Cool work safety tool from WorkSafeBC - "What's wrong with this photo?" was the previous entry in this blog.

Cavalcade of Risk & briefs from the Blogosphere is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

OpenID accepted here Learn more about OpenID