March 29, 2010

Performance Dis-incentive Programs

Performance incentive programs are a good idea - except when they aren't. The Insider has always viewed such programs with ambivalence: yes, it's a good idea to reward employees for safe performance over a given time period. The problem is that these programs can discourage employees from reporting legitimate injuries. And the employee who does report an injury - the guy or gal who breaks the string of injury-free days - may incur the resentment of fellow workers. "You blew the pizza and the draw for a TV because you cut your hand!" It can be yet another form of the great American tradition, blaming the victim.

Then there are the rogue performance incentive programs, where non-reporting of injuries is embedded in the work culture. Which brings us to California. (Is it my imagination, or does every conceivable scam bring us to California?)

At the Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation, the performance incentive program rewarded managers for not reporting workers comp claims. The company's motto is "solving it from all sides" - and it appears that one of the sides is, well, illegal.

David Polk, 53, and Douglas Tateoka, 61, pleaded no contest Wednesday to charges of concealing events related to on-the-job injuries and conspiring to deny injured workers their benefits. The two are scheduled for sentencing May 20 in Monterey County Superior Court.

Employees were discouraged from reporting workers comp claims. When injured, they were treated outside of the comp system: the employer took care of the medical bills. It's not clear whether any attempt was made to pay indemnity for lost time. I doubt it.

As is usual and customary in California, doctors figured out a way to make a few bucks in the scam: in this case, Steven Davis of Davis Chiropractic, who once worked for Surfit-Stone as a human relations manager, and Eugene Guzman, a physician's assistant at Pinnacle Urgent Care. Both are facing charges in the fraud.

Whose Incentive?
Any performance incentive program that focuses exclusively on managers is immediately suspect: a legitimate program rewards workers first, then managers, for good safety performance.

Performance incentive programs have a positive role in many workplaces, but it's crucial to align the incentives with the realities of the workplace. These programs should celebrate safe performance without penalizing or ostracizing employees who suffer injuries on the job. Beyond that, performance incentives must never trump employee rights under workers comp laws. It's one thing to reward safe performance; it's quite another to stifle claims reporting and the awarding of statutory benefits.

Managers at box manufacturer Smurfit-Stone tried thinking out of the box to lower their comp costs. Now they are on their way to a concrete box with bars on the windows. They are about to participate in a very effective performance disincentive program, one that most of us try diligently to avoid.


| 2 Comments

2 Comments

Lets all think out of the box for a minute.

If the employer covers the costs of an accident and the time lost and there is compensateable disability who is worse off.

The company avoids higher premiums, the
employee is made whole. Where is the
harm.

If the company is paying for grouop health and workers comp and picks up the co pay for the health insurance and lets the group carrier pay the claim who is worse off.

The company pays higher group premiums
and the employee is whole.

Under Obama care workers comp is going to be redundant. There will no longer be any reason to have workers compensation. Just incorporate it into the government mandate health care and cut out more private buisness and create more government jobs.

Except in this and similar claim hiding cases, the employer does not pay the entire cost of the claim, forgetting to pay temporary disability etc. thus the employee is not made whole. I don't think that under "Obama Care" workers comp will be redundant at all. Health insurance reform addresses only personal medical insurance and provision of coverage not work related injuries/illnesses. I agree that it is in the self-interest of the employer to prevent costly claims, especially since the real costs usually far exceed the claims cost in delays, property damage, management time etc. In fact, I wonder exactly how much time the convicted managers spent on hiding claims that could otherwise have been spent on trying to prevent the injuries in the first place!

Subscribe

Submit your email to be notified when this site is updated

Need help with your workers' comp program?

Monthly Archives

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Jon Coppelman published on March 29, 2010 11:50 AM.

Pilot with a Death Wish was the previous entry in this blog.

Mining safety: not just for China is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

OpenID accepted here Learn more about OpenID