March 17, 2009

New day for OSHA?

Labor leaders and business leaders are in agreement that the new administration will mean a more activist OSHA, with more targeted investigations and tougher penalties for hiding workplace injuries. Some predict that there will be an increase in standards - although that shouldn't be a tough record to beat since there was only one standard issued under the Bush administration for Hexavalent Chromium and that occurred under court order. Others think that employer penalties for willful violation of safety standards that result in injuries or deaths could also become a reality. Health and safety advocates and labor leaders are hoping that the new administration will undo some of the backsliding in terms of safety regulations and standards that occurred during the prior administration.

Among the campaign promises he made, Barrack Obama's platform included a pledge to increase worker safety. So far he appears to be making good on that promise. OSHA got a 6% increase for 2009, or an additional $27 million, to bring the agency's total budget for the year to $513. The Bureau of Labor Statistics also was increased by $52 million, some of which is for tracking injury and illness statistics. He has also proposed raising discretionary funding for the Department of Labor by $1.5 billion by 2010, with a sizable portion to go to OSHA.

At her recent swearing in ceremony, U.S. Secretary of Labor Hilda L. Solis put employers who are subjecting employees to dangerous working conditions or are shorting employee pay on notice: "Let me be clear, there is a new sheriff in town," she stated, emphasizing her intention to use tough enforcement, transparency, cooperation and balance to protect workers. On the health and safety front, Solis has already taken action to expedite a standard to protect workers from bronchiolitis obliterans, a serious and potentially fatal lung disease associated with exposure to food flavorings containing diacetyl, or the so-called popcorn lung. Many think that progress will also be made on ergonomics and tuberculosis standards, as well as strengthened standards for crane safety.



"The Bureau of Labor Statistics also was increased by $52 million, some of which is for tracking injury and illness statistics"

I wonder if they use any of they funds to track how many manufacturing jobs have been shipped overseas because of government regulation. We may not want the jobs because they are too dangerous. But wouldn't it to be nice to know when the government says "we have lost millions of manufacturing jobs" how many were do to government action?

As someone who was deeply involved in the OSHA ergonomics regulation fight in 2000/2001, I have heard through the grapevine that the ergonomics standard may also rear it's head again. If you'll remember, it was a very broad standard that partially superseded and generally conflicted with state sovereignty regarding workers' compensation, despite a specific provision in the OSH Act prohibiting federal preemption.

People died and continue to die because they work making popcorn flavoring powder, while the industry refuses to admit there's a problem, refuses to change the work process to protect workers, and while the government refuses to write or enforce regulations that would make them.


Submit your email to be notified when this site is updated

Need help with your workers' comp program?

Monthly Archives

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Julie Ferguson published on March 17, 2009 9:34 AM.

AIG: Failure's Fat Rewards was the previous entry in this blog.

Shift Work and Breast Cancer: A Presumptive Link? is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

OpenID accepted here Learn more about OpenID