December 19, 2008

The Big Squeeze on FedEx

We have frequently blogged the labor issues at FedEx, the ubiquitous delivery giant. FedEx relies on "independent contractor" drivers for business and neighborhood deliveries. An interesting article by Corey Dade in the Wall Street Journal (subscription required) discusses the potential impact of a Democratic Congress on FedEx's business model. An 800 pound gorilla has just taken a seat in the board room beside FedEx CEO Fred Smith.

FedEx began 35 years ago as an airline. As such, it fell under the Railway Labor Act of 1926, which made unionization of public and commercial transport companies extremely difficult. By contrast, UPS began as a trucking company and was subject to the National Labor Relations Act from day one. UPS is unionized: they pay workers more than FedEx, they provide better benefits. (Of course, the Wall Street Journal points out that these higher wages and benefits have hurt the growth of UPS stock.)

With the pending Democratic control of Congress, FedEx finds its business model under fire. Representative James Oberstar (D-Minnesota) will propose an amendment to the Federal Aviation Administration Act that would remove truck drivers, couriers and other FedEx employees from the Railway Labor Act. In other words, the door to unionization will be thrown wide open.

The Journal article does not mention the difficulties that FedEx has had in state courts, where their so-called "independent contractor" drivers, who wear FedEx uniforms and drive FedEx trucks, have been consistently found to be FedEx employees. FedEx finds itself caught in a big squeeze: potential changes in enabling legislation opening the door to unions plus state level pressures to reclassify 15,000 drivers as employees. The entire business model is at risk.

FedEx has remained profitable during the recent downturn, posting a 3% increase in net income. Nonetheless, CEO Smith has voluntarily reduced his own salary by 20% and has given up his bonus. The company has also cut wages for all employees and stopped contributing to employee retirement plans. Because the workforce is union-free, the company has been able to react quickly and unilaterally to reduce (payroll) expenses.

This type of maneuvering would be much more difficult - if not impossible - under a unionized workforce. Rates of pay, benefits and working conditions are all subject to collective bargaining - never a speedy process when take-aways are on the table. It's ironic that the very flexibility that keeps FedEx profitable during this economic downtime is also the source of FedEx's troubles in the long run. It's always difficult to predict the future, but the 800 pound gorilla stalking FedEx appears ready to light up a cigar.

| 1 Comment

1 Comment

Jon:

You have just touched on the surface. As of this morning taxpayers have bailed out the United Auto Workers through their employers.

Organized Labor raised 100s of millions of dollars for the Denocrats in the last election. There goal is the unionization of America to the detriment of both business and the employee to increase the power and wealth of Union leaders.

Watch the path of destruction they create. If the Unions have their way (and it looks like they may) Shermans march to the sea will look like a frat prank to Southern Business when the Unions are done. The North won't be much better and right to work laws will go the way of Jim Crow.

The American electorate is going to get what they wished for and boy will they be sorry.

Charles

Subscribe

Submit your email to be notified when this site is updated

Need help with your workers' comp program?

Monthly Archives

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Jon Coppelman published on December 19, 2008 9:30 AM.

Cavalcade of Risk; introducing some blog finds was the previous entry in this blog.

The Hazards of Deconstruction is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

OpenID accepted here Learn more about OpenID