December 16, 2008

OSHA rule on Personal Protective Equipment in effect January 12, 2009

Last week, OSHA unveiled its final rule on Clarification of Employer Duty To Provide Personal Protective Equipment and Train Each Employee. To comply with this standard, beginning January 12, 2009, employers must provide personal protective equipment and hazards training for each employee covered by the standards. According to OSHA:

"The amendments add no new compliance obligations. Employers are not required to provide any new type of PPE or training, to provide PPE or training to any employee not already covered by the existing requirements, or to provide PPE or training in a different manner than that already required. The amendments simply clarify that the standards apply to each employee."

The Pump Handle offers a good post about why a clarification of the OSHA PPE rule was necessary. Essentially, it was needed to eliminate ambiguity and to ensure a consistent approach in OSH review decisions. The post cites an egregious violation by a Texas employer who failed to equip or train a number of undocumented workers who were hired to remove asbestos from a building. it was a flagrant violation - the employer began operating secretly at night behind locked gates after being ordered to shut down by a city building inspector. In OSHA citations, there was ambiguity about whether his conduct should result in one aggregate violation or individual violations for each employee who was exposed.

| 1 Comment

1 Comment

Yes ! Just let them police themselves and we end up in 'Bailout City.' like with Wall Street. In Detroit, we have the corporate managements gone wild and blaming the frontline workers, how insane is that? Since when does the assembly line worker, other than strikes have that kind of power? When management is taking their work OUTSIDE the country and blaming unions for costs ~ say we weren't born yesterday. This country took our economy out of the country, now the government wants US to bailout the world. No, get a handle on corporations and their charters to do business with us and in this country. Bankruptcy laws should be the same for individuals and corportions period end of story.
Safety, corporations have the obligation, yes obligation to protect the safety of their employees. OBLIGATION !!!!

Subscribe

Submit your email to be notified when this site is updated

Need help with your workers' comp program?

Monthly Archives

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Julie Ferguson published on December 16, 2008 10:06 AM.

Health Wonk Review, medical costs, price hikes, joint & several liability, and more was the previous entry in this blog.

Cavalcade of Risk; introducing some blog finds is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

OpenID accepted here Learn more about OpenID